A Cowboy’s Guide To School Board Member P.R.

Susan Salter
Director of Public Relations
Alabama Association of School Boards
susan@theaasb.org

Don’t squat with your spurs on.  From over-zealous zero tolerance policies to overly strict limits on public comments in board meetings, school boards can be the creators of their own P.R. pain. Does yours have policies or practices that could cause serious image damage down the road? If you don’t know, take time to review the policy manual and the general practices of your board meetings. Ask yourself:

 

·        Are discipline policies flexible enough to allow reasonable punishment for innocent mistakes? Or, will they force you to expel a first-grader for having a Tweety Bird nail clipper?

 

·        How will you handle an angry delegation that arrives unexpectedly at a board meeting and wants to speak? Will your existing practices soothe troubled waters or stir up a hurricane?

 

·        Do citizens know how to get on the agenda? Craft a “Welcome to Our Meeting” flyer to distribute at schools and meetings. Explain how board meetings work, when/how the board allows public comments, any guidelines for comments, and what to do/who to call with complaints.

 

Good fences make good neighbors. A school board and superintendent who respect each other’s turf can work together on mutually agreed upon goals and lead as a cohesive unit. But when board members micromanage, destructive range wars are almost inevitable. Remember (and help the public understand) that the board creates the vision for the schools, sets policy and holds the superintendent accountable; the superintendent manages day-to-day operations and oversees investigations of personnel problems. When parents come to board members with complaints, they should listen politely and refer them to the superintendent or appropriate staff member.

 

Close the barn door before the horse gets out. Your staff can be your best P.R. communicators or your worst nightmare. Do they feel respected and appreciated? Set a high standard of professional competence for staff members, and then publicly recognize those who excel. Let them know you value their expertise by including them on advisory panels and task forces, looking to them for solutions, and encouraging them to be part of school and system goal-setting activities.

 

And, always keep staff informed about decisions and issues. Nothing torpedoes a great new program like having rank-and-file employees out questioning its effectiveness or cost at the grocery store or ball fields.

 

Say it plain and save some breath for breathin’. Are your meetings fogged with terms like NCLB, disaggregated data, IEPs, FERPA or other jargon that chokes the life out of a discussion? To help folks understand discussions clearly, ask the superintendent and staff to avoid acronyms and explain education terms during their presentations to the board. For particularly complex discussions, ask the staff to prepare a simple handout outlining the issues and defining the terms for audience members.

Even if you’re on the right track you’ll get run over if you just sit there. Don’t let yourself or your board get so bogged down in personnel/budget/transportation issues that you – and the public – lose sight of the instructional program.

 

·        Restructure your agenda. Spend at least as much time addressing student learning as you do books and buses.

·        Hold an annual work session to review the results of the testing program. Ask the superintendent to identify instructional strengths and weakness as well as areas to be improved. Again, insist discussions be in plain English, not education-ese.

·        Hold an annual goal-setting retreat or work session. Review progress on last year’s goals and set priorities for next year.

·        Honor student and staff accomplishments at every board meeting. This helps keep you focused and reiterates successes to the public and media.

·        Periodically have teachers or students demonstrate an innovation that is affecting them.

·        Post a sign in the boardroom asking, “How will this affect children?”

Never take to sawing the branch that’s supporting you unless you’re being hung from it.  Because we are so familiar with our schools’ problems and challenges, it is easy to think we know the best solutions. But to gain – and keep – the community support you need, treat the public like co-owners, not customers, or worse, like disinterested parties. To do that:

 

·        Use 2-way communication. Spend at least as much time listening to what citizens want for their children and schools as you do talking about your programs and accomplishments. Create regular opportunities for them to share their input before decisions get made.

·        Launch a community conversation. Focus on a school issue or children’s issues in general. Invite all comers to discuss and help develop a shared vision for solving the problem(s). Use the results as a map for charting your course.

·        Create eye-openers. Periodically, host informal breakfast meetings with a community group (perhaps Realtors one time, ministers another) to help them understand an issue or program. Allow plenty of time for questions, and use those questions to help map your communication strategies.

·        Create your personal key communicators network. Make a point to tell opinion leaders regularly about things going on in the schools and to ask what they are hearing.

 

If somebody outdraws you, smile and walk away. There’s plenty of time to look tough when you’re out of sight.  A surefire way to shoot your schools’ image in the foot is for board members, the superintendent or staff to become mired in a battle of wills. Remember, board members have no individual authority. It’s only when they sit as a board that decisions can be made. Even when they disagree, trust that your fellow board members are working just as hard as you are to make the right decisions for children. Board members must accept that the majority rules and move on. Criticizing the choice (or board members) only harms the system in the long run.

 

 Back to top

 

An Open Letter

At press time, Governor Riley’s series of bills addressing Alabama’s funding crisis was still being considered by the legislature. No doubt, you have already heard from those who suggest the problem is not the amount of money we budget, but how it is spent. Here is a response to just such a letter received by the state Department of Education.

 

It’s no secret that investing in education now saves on investing in prisons and social service programs down the road. But if, in economic hard times, we rob education budgets — requiring major cuts in summer school and after-school programs, and less traditional courses such as music and art, access to textbooks and qualified teachers — aren’t we really robbing our children of brighter futures and our society of one of the greatest tools for economic development...well-educated and productive citizens?

 

Governor Riley’s tax reform package is simply about fairness — something we have not known in this state for decades. It gives breaks to the less fortunate and requires those with more to pay their fair share. Under Riley’s proposal, more than half of Alabama families, those with earnings of $47,000 a year or less, would see a decrease in their income taxes. The state’s median family income is $41,000. Simply put: the poor — who pay a greater share of their income in taxes — would see their state taxes fall, while wealthy taxpayers — who pay a much smaller share of their income — would see some increases. In the end, it’s a more balanced approached to fundamentally changing how we do business in Alabama.  However, even if we double property taxes in Alabama we will still be below the rest of the nation and Southeast. We can no longer even say “Thank God for Mississippi.”

 

The fact that we have to “live within a limited budget” is something we’ve known in K-12 education for the last several years. In fact, the state’s K-12 Education budget was cut in 2001 and most local school systems had to either borrow money or dip into any reserve accounts to help ensure services did not suffer. The following year (2002), was an election year. Although proration (a budget reduction) probably should have been declared, it was not because 2002 was an election year. So here we are in 2003, the third consecutive year of cash-strapped schools and social services (note the federal lawsuit against the state for underfunded and overcrowded prisons, as well as another federal lawsuit against the transportation department, not to mention the rising cost of Medicaid for the elderly, etc.). Budgets for such services have been lean and mean and Governor Riley, like others before him, cannot ferret all the waste and inefficiencies to help solve the nearly $700 million dollar budget shortfalls that now exist. Something more substantial must be done to reform our funding for such key measures, or we will forever be in the bottom tier states in ranking after ranking.

 

When the public demanded more accountability in education, we delivered. We've done more with less for the last eight years. In fact, the 1995 education accountability law passed by the Alabama Legislature now helps our state's K-12 lead the nation with many improvements. We now have the toughest graduation requirements in the nation. College admission scores for Alabama’s seniors have been above the regional average for the last fives years (and with more students taking the test). We’ve developed the highly successful Alabama Reading Initiative and Alabama Math, Science, and Technology Initiative, which other states are copying. Additionally, our career and technical education programs are now aligned to business and industry standards. Plus, every school and school system receives a report card, which is sent home to parents that evaluates performance in academics, general school information, and financial management. The federal No Child Left Behind Act continues to bring more transparency and accountability in public education. All of these programs and strategies are an investment in our state’s future. Now we must have the money to more fully implement or risk losing the many gains we have made over the last several years.

 

I hope you will support the Governor’s efforts to help build a world-class infrastructure in Alabama. Imagine the possibilities.

 

Back to top

 

PRO’S Corner


Dealing With Rogue Reporters

By Jerry Brown, APR

Senior Counselor-Public Relations

Corporate Advocates, LLC

jbrown@corporateadvocates.net

 

The New York Times’ admission that one of its reporters fabricated and plagiarized stories for more than a year is a stark example of one of the toughest problems faced by public relations professionals and their clients: Reporters who write inaccurate or unfair stories.

 

Here are six guidelines for dealing with rogue reporters who can’t or won’t get it right:

 

1.  Start with the reporter. If you have a complaint about a story, talk to the reporter first. Don’t go over the reporter’s head unless you absolutely have to.

 

2.  Document your complaint. If you take your case to an editor, document the problems you’re having with the reporter. If other reporters got the story/stories right, document that, too.

 

3.  Take a reasoned and reasonable approach. Neither the reporter nor his/her editors will care whether you consider the story “positive” or “negative.” But you are entitled to fair and accurate coverage. Good journalists will listen if you can make a compelling case that the reporter’s coverage is consistently unfair or inaccurate.

 

4. Pick your battles. Sad to say, mistakes are reasonably commonplace in news stories. Don’t ignore factual inaccuracies that do you harm. But save your real battles for the ones that really matter. And don’t complain just because the reporter didn’t give the story your “spin.”

 

5.  Be patient. It may take awhile. The Times received complaints from many sources about its reporter for a year before taking action. The paper finally acted after another newspaper complained about plagiarism and went public with its complaint.

 

6.  Look for alternative ways to tell your story. If possible, find other avenues for telling your story -- other news organizations, your Web site, your employee publications, direct contact with customers/clients — when a reporter who covers you is consistently inaccurate or unfair.

 

Back to top

 

Quotes

 


A Rose By Any Other Name…

In real life, unlike in Shakespeare, the sweetness of the rose depends upon the name it bears. Things are not only what they are. They are, in very important respects, what they seem to be.

            Hubert Humphrey

 

Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them

            Bill Vaughn

 

The scientific name for an animal that doesn't either run from or fight its enemies is lunch.

            Michael Friedman

 

Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.

            John F. Kennedy

 

Property left to a child may soon be lost; but the inheritance of virtue — a good name an unblemished reputation — will abide forever. If those who are toiling for wealth to leave their children, would but take half the pains to secure for them virtuous habits, how much more serviceable would they be. The largest property may be wrested from a child, but virtue will stand by him to the last.

            William Sumner

 

 

Back to top

Web Notes

 


 PR On The Web – Some Summertime Reading

 


www.internetprguide.com/pr_insight

Links to several articles on public relations

 

www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/press.shtml

How to get the media on your side!

 

www.apexawards.com/media.htm

For good media relations, treat them like customers!

 

www.netpreneur.org/news/prmachine/pr/default.html

The 10 elements of an effective news release

 

www.arfunk.com/getontvnews.html

How to get your story on local TV news.

 

http://publicrelations.about.com

Quick and easy resources for maintaining good public relations.

 

Back to top

Quick Facts

 


 

 

(From USA Today)

 

Back to top

 


Stylebook

Use Metaphors To Communicate, Not Decorate

(From Writing That Works www.apexawards.com/metaphors.htm)

 

Good metaphors emerge from the writer’s experience and observation. They connect the readers’ knowledge to new ideas or information through concrete images. No matter what you’re writing, you can use metaphors to create images that make the abstract concrete, says writer and writing teacher Rebecca McClanahan.

 

“When you work in images, you are connecting with the sensory experience of your reader,” she says. Appealing to several parts of the brain, good metaphors connect with readers at a deeper level than straight facts and help them remember what they’ve read.

 

“You can’t escape metaphor. Our language is full of it,” McClanahan says. Metaphors are so common from our early years (e.g., “Little pitchers have big ears”) that we forget their power in introducing new information or presenting old ideas in a new way. Effective metaphors are so embedded in the language we sometimes don’t realize we’re using figurative language.

 

Too often, however, writers borrow others’ metaphors (e.g., “surfing the Net”) that have become clichés. Good metaphors are original, but not weird or strange. “When you are writing from inside your own experience, you’re quite likely to arrive at original metaphors,” says McClanahan. She agrees with Aristotle that metaphors are perceptions of resemblances, so each writer’s metaphors should come from his or her perceptions.

 

Don’t write your piece and then go back and insert metaphors to embellish it. They should be born during your thinking process, part of your way of arriving at a new thought. Open yourself up to seeing likenesses, transfers and connections as you write.

 

Examine your metaphors after you’ve completed your draft, the writer advises. Delete clichés and check for accuracy. For example, “Her tears gushed like a geyser” is a ridiculous image because it’s inaccurate. While metaphors stray from the literal truth, they must make sense. If they’re far-fetched or strange, the reader won’t accept them. The whole piece becomes endangered.

 

When writers use one metaphor, they often toss in another, but don’t let metaphors compete for readers’ attention. After reading a good metaphor, the reader needs time to think about it. So leave in only your best metaphors.

Make sure your metaphors are fresh and that you’re saying just enough. You mustn’t sidetrack, and thereby lose, readers. “The metaphor has to serve the larger idea,” McClanahan says.

 

In evaluating your metaphors, ask a simple question: Have I heard this before? If it’s familiar, decide whether it’s a tired cliché or serves to establish your ground.

 

A bad metaphor is worse than no metaphor. “If it doesn't spring naturally from the writer’s eye and ear, the writer’s own connection with the world, it’s going to feel false.”

 

Metaphors shouldn’t stand out. If the reader stops to admire the words, you’ve interrupted the thought. The metaphor should be so obvious you can’t pull it out. “The purpose of writing isn’t to make a metaphor but to take readers on whatever journey you want to take them.”

 

 

Back to top

 

Just For Fun

 

 

 

 

Back to top

 

Important Web Links

 


Featured School Site — D.A. Smith Middle School (Ozark City)

 

ALSDE Home

SDE Events Calendar

 

National School Public Relations Association

 

Alabama School Communicators Association

 

PROS Archive

 

Back to top